Calendar

Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
1/19
First class meeting 4:00p - 5:50p ECEB 1002
1/26
Second class meeting 4:00p - 5:50p ECEB 1002
CAD assignment due 11:59p
2/2
Add/Drop Deadline due 11:59p
Third class meeting 4:00p - 5:50p ECEB 1002
Project approval due 11:59p
2/9
First team meetings with TAs 4:00p - 5:50p ECEB 3081
Proposals due 11:59p
2/16
Initial Conversation With Machine Shop (required if using the shop) due 4:00p ECEB 1047
PCB Review 3:00p - 5:00p ECEB 3081
Team Contract due 11:59p
2/23
Design Review Sign-up due 11:59p
Design Document due 11:59p
3/2
Design Review 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
Design Review 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
Design Review 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
3/9
Breadboard Demo 8:00a WIth Instructor and TA
Breadboard Demo 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TA
Breadboard Demo 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TA
Last day for revisions to the machine shop due ECEB 1048
3/16
Spring Break
Spring Break
Spring Break
Spring Break
Spring Break
3/23
3/30
4/6
Progress Demo 8:00a - 6:00p 2070
Progress Demo 8:00a - 6:00p
Progress Demo 8:00a - 6:00p 2070
4/13
4/20
Mock demo During weekly TA mtg
Mock demo During weekly TA mtg
Mock demo During weekly TA mtg
Mock demo During weekly TA mtg
Mock Presentation With Comm and ECE TAs
Mock Presentation With Comm and ECE TAs
Mock demo During weekly TA mtg
Video Assignment due 11:59p
4/27
Final Demo 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
Final Demo 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
Final Demo 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
Final Presentation 8:00a - 6:00p With instructor and TAs
Final Presentation 8:00a - 6:00p With Instructor and TAs
5/4
Pitched Project Reviews 2070
Final papers due 11:59p
Lab checkout 3:00p - 4:30p With TA
Lab Notebook Due due 11:59p

Master Bus Processor

Clay Kaiser, Philip Macias, Richard Mannion

Master Bus Processor

Featured Project

General Description

We will design a Master Bus Processor (MBP) for music production in home studios. The MBP will use a hybrid analog/digital approach to provide both the desirable non-linearities of analog processing and the flexibility of digital control. Our design will be less costly than other audio bus processors so that it is more accessible to our target market of home studio owners. The MBP will be unique in its low cost as well as in its incorporation of a digital hardware control system. This allows for more flexibility and more intuitive controls when compared to other products on the market.

Design Proposal

Our design would contain a core functionality with scalability in added functionality. It would be designed to fit in a 2U rack mount enclosure with distinct boards for digital and analog circuits to allow for easier unit testings and account for digital/analog interference.

The audio processing signal chain would be composed of analog processing 'blocks’--like steps in the signal chain.

The basic analog blocks we would integrate are:

Compressor/limiter modes

EQ with shelf/bell modes

Saturation with symmetrical/asymmetrical modes

Each block’s multiple modes would be controlled by a digital circuit to allow for intuitive mode selection.

The digital circuit will be responsible for:

Mode selection

Analog block sequence

DSP feedback and monitoring of each analog block (REACH GOAL)

The digital circuit will entail a series of buttons to allow the user to easily select which analog block to control and another button to allow the user to scroll between different modes and presets. Another button will allow the user to control sequence of the analog blocks. An LCD display will be used to give the user feedback of the current state of the system when scrolling and selecting particular modes.

Reach Goals

added DSP functionality such as monitoring of the analog functions

Replace Arduino boards for DSP with custom digital control boards using ATmega328 microcontrollers (same as arduino board)

Rack mounted enclosure/marketable design

System Verification

We will qualify the success of the project by how closely its processing performance matches the design intent. Since audio 'quality’ can be highly subjective, we will rely on objective metrics such as Gain Reduction (GR [dB]), Total Harmonic Distortion (THD [%]), and Noise [V] to qualify the analog processing blocks. The digital controls will be qualified by their ability to actuate the correct analog blocks consistently without causing disruptions to the signal chain or interference. Additionally, the hardware user interface will be qualified by ease of use and intuitiveness.

Project Videos