Project

# Title Team Members TA Documents Sponsor
3 WHEELED-LEGGED BALANCING ROBOT
Best Overall Project
 Gabriel Gao
Jerry Wang
Zehao Yuan
 design_document1.pdf
final_paper1.pdf
photo1.jpg
photo2.png
presentation1.pdf
proposal2.pdf
video
# WHEELED-LEGGED BALANCING ROBOT

## Team Members:
- Gabriel Gao (ngao4)
- Zehao Yuan (zehaoy2)
- Jerry Wang (runxuan6)

# Problem

The motivation for this project arises from the limitations inherent in conventional wheeled delivery robots, which predominantly feature a four-wheel chassis. This design restricts their ability to navigate terrains with obstacles, bumps, and stairs—common features in urban environments. A wheel-legged balancing robot, on the other hand, can effortlessly overcome such challenges, making it a particularly promising solution for delivery services.

# Solution

The primary objective of this phase of the project is to demonstrate that a single leg of the robot can successfully bear weight and function as an electronic suspension system. Achieving this will lay the foundation for the subsequent development of the full robot.

# Solution Components

## Subsystem 1. Hybrid Mobility Module:

Actuated Legs: Four actuator motors (DM-J4310-2EC) power the legged system, enabling the robot to navigate uneven surfaces, obstacles, and stairs. The legs also functions as an advanced electromagnetic suspension system, quickly adjusting damping and stiffness to ensure a stable and level platform.

Wheeled Drive: Two direct drive BLDC (M3508) motors propel the wheels, enabling efficient travel on flat terrains.

**Note: 4xDM4310s and 2xM3508 motor can be borrow from RSO: Illini Robomaster** - [Image of Motors on campus](https://github.com/ngao4/Wheel_Legged_Robot/blob/main/image/motors.jpg)

The DM4310 has a built in ESC with CAN bus and double absolute encoder, able to provide 4 nm continuous torque. This torque allows the robot or the leg system to act as suspension system and carry enough weight for further application. M3508 also has ESC available in the lab, it is an FOC ESC with CAN bus communication. So in this project we are not focusing on motor driver parts. The motors would communicate with STM32 through CAN bus with about 1 kHz rate.

## Subsystem 2. Central Control Unit and PCB:
An STM32F103 microcontroller acts as the brain of the robot, processing input from the IMU through SPI signal, directing the motors through CAN bus. The pcb includes STM32F103 chip, BMI088 imu, power supply parts and also sbus remote control signal inverter.
Might further upgrade to STM32F407 if needed.

Attitude Sensing: A 6-axis IMU (BMI088) continuously monitors the robot's orientation and motion, facilitating real-time adjustments to ensure stability and correct navigation. The BMI088 would be part of the PCB component.

## Subsystem 3. Testing Platform
The leg will be connected to a harness as shown in this [sketch](https://github.com/ngao4/Wheel_Legged_Robot/blob/main/image/sketch.jpg). The harness simplifies the model by restricting the robot’s motion in the Y-axis, while retaining the freedom for the robot to move on the X-axis and jump in the Z-axis. The harness also guarantees safety as it prevents the robot from moving outside its limit.

## Subsystem 4. Payload Compartment (3D-printed):
A designated section to securely hold and transport items, ensuring that they are protected from disturbances during transit. We will add weights to test the maximum payload of the robot.

## Subsystem 5. Remote Controller:
A 2.4 GHz RC sbus remote controller will be used to control the robot. This hand-held device provides real-time control, making it simple for us to operate the robot at various distances. Safety is ensured as we can set a switch as a kill switch to shutdown the robot in emergency conditions.

**Note: Remote controller model: DJI DT7, can be borrow from RSO: Illini Robomaster**

The remote controller set comes with a receiver, the output is sbus signal which is commonly used in RC control. We would add an inverter circuit on pcb allowing the sbus signal to be read by STM32.
Note: When only demoing the leg function, the RC controller may not be used.

## Subsystem 6. Power System
We are considering a 6s (24V) Lithium Battery to power the robot. An alternative solution is to power the robot through a power supply using a pair of long wires.

# Criterion For Success

**Stable Balancing:** The robot (leg) should maintain its balance in a variety of situations, both static (when stationary) and dynamic (when moving).

**Cargo Carriage:** The robot(leg) can be able to carry a specified weight (like 1lb) without compromising its balance or ability to move.

_________________________________________________________________________
**If we are able to test the leg and function normally before midterm, we would try to build the whole wheel legged balancing robot out. It would be able to complete the following :**

**Directional Movement:** Via remote control, the robot should move precisely in the desired direction(up and down), showcasing smooth accelerations, decelerations, and turns.

**Platform Leveling:** Even when navigating slopes or uneven terrains, the robot should consistently ensure that its platform remains flat, preserving the integrity of the cargo it carries. Any tilt should be minimized, ideally maintaining a platform angle variation within a range of 10 degrees or less from the horizontal.

**Position Retention:** In the event of disruptions like pushes or kicks, the robot should make efforts to return to its original location or at least resist being moved too far off its original position.

**Safety:** During its operations, the robot should not pose a danger to its surroundings, ensuring controlled movements, especially when correcting its balance or position. The robot should be able to shut down (safety mode) by remote control.

Musical Hand

Ramsey Foote, Thomas MacDonald, Michelle Zhang

Musical Hand

Featured Project

# Musical Hand

Team Members:

- Ramesey Foote (rgfoote2)

- Michelle Zhang (mz32)

- Thomas MacDonald (tcm5)

# Problem

Musical instruments come in all shapes and sizes; however, transporting instruments often involves bulky and heavy cases. Not only can transporting instruments be a hassle, but the initial purchase and maintenance of an instrument can be very expensive. We would like to solve this problem by creating an instrument that is lightweight, compact, and low maintenance.

# Solution

Our project involves a wearable system on the chest and both hands. The left hand will be used to dictate the pitches of three “strings” using relative angles between the palm and fingers. For example, from a flat horizontal hand a small dip in one finger is associated with a low frequency. A greater dip corresponds to a higher frequency pitch. The right hand will modulate the generated sound by adding effects such as vibrato through lateral motion. Finally, the brains of the project will be the central unit, a wearable, chest-mounted subsystem responsible for the audio synthesis and output.

Our solution would provide an instrument that is lightweight and easy to transport. We will be utilizing accelerometers instead of flex sensors to limit wear and tear, which would solve the issue of expensive maintenance typical of more physical synthesis methods.

# Solution Components

The overall solution has three subsystems; a right hand, left hand, and a central unit.

## Subsystem 1 - Left Hand

The left hand subsystem will use four digital accelerometers total: three on the fingers and one on the back of the hand. These sensors will be used to determine the angle between the back of the hand and each of the three fingers (ring, middle, and index) being used for synthesis. Each angle will correspond to an analog signal for pitch with a low frequency corresponding to a completely straight finger and a high frequency corresponding to a completely bent finger. To filter out AC noise, bypass capacitors and possibly resistors will be used when sending the accelerometer signals to the central unit.

## Subsystem 2 - Right Hand

The right subsystem will use one accelerometer to determine the broad movement of the hand. This information will be used to determine how much of a vibrato there is in the output sound. This system will need the accelerometer, bypass capacitors (.1uF), and possibly some resistors if they are needed for the communication scheme used (SPI or I2C).

## Subsystem 3 - Central Unit

The central subsystem utilizes data from the gloves to determine and generate the correct audio. To do this, two microcontrollers from the STM32F3 series will be used. The left and right hand subunits will be connected to the central unit through cabling. One of the microcontrollers will receive information from the sensors on both gloves and use it to calculate the correct frequencies. The other microcontroller uses these frequencies to generate the actual audio. The use of two separate microcontrollers allows for the logic to take longer, accounting for slower human response time, while meeting needs for quicker audio updates. At the output, there will be a second order multiple feedback filter. This will get rid of any switching noise while also allowing us to set a gain. This will be done using an LM358 Op amp along with the necessary resistors and capacitors to generate the filter and gain. This output will then go to an audio jack that will go to a speaker. In addition, bypass capacitors, pull up resistors, pull down resistors, and the necessary programming circuits will be implemented on this board.

# Criterion For Success

The minimum viable product will consist of two wearable gloves and a central unit that will be connected together via cords. The user will be able to adjust three separate notes that will be played simultaneously using the left hand, and will be able to apply a sound effect using the right hand. The output audio should be able to be heard audibly from a speaker.

Project Videos