Project

# Title Team Members TA Documents Sponsor
13 Closed-loop Temperature Controlled Lava Globe
The Lextech Senior Design Most Marketable Project Award
Daniel Frei
Devin Bryant
Matthew Romano
James Norton design_document0.pdf
design_document0.pdf
final_paper0.pdf
other0.pdf
photo0.jpg
presentation0.pdf
video
video
The lava lamp has been around since the 1960’s and appears to have changed very little since then. We intend to breathe new life into this iconic piece of technology. The most apparent change we intend to make is to the shape. The original lava lamp was conical whereas our lava globe will be spherical. We think this would be more aesthetically pleasing. Although we aren’t completely sure of the effect this will have on the movement of the lava globules, the function should remain similar.

Our second design change is decoupling the heating and lighting elements. In conventional lava lamps the heating element is the bulb. Our plan is to utilize a separate heating element and place an array of LEDs below the globe on the base, illuminating the globules from the outside. This decision will grant us more freedom with how we choose to light the lava globe. Moreover, the color of the LEDs will be determined by ambient room temperature via a microcontroller. For example, cold temperatures could produce blue light while warmer temperatures could produce a more reddish hue.

Also concerning temperature, we plan to implement a temperature control circuit (similar to a thermostat) that will keep the temperature within acceptable operating range without overheating. Current lava lamps can overheat after several hours of use which cause the lava globules to become smaller and stay near the top. This reduces the visual appeal. There is also a possible safety concern with overheating. Our version will be a safe and an interesting addition to any coffee table or nightstand.

To the best of our knowledge this is a novel design. The only comparable lamp is the “Mathmos Smart Astro Lava Lamp”, however only videos exist and it’s not available for purchase.

Gesture Controlled Surveillance Robot

Roshni Mathew, Kushl Saboo, Suvid Singh

Gesture Controlled Surveillance Robot

Featured Project

# Gesture Controlled Surveillance Robot

Team Members:

- Roshni Mathew (roshnim3)

- Kushl Saboo (kushls2)

- Suvid Singh (suvids2)

# Problem

In disaster and rescue scenarios (collapsed structures, smoke-filled buildings, unstable debris fields), responders often need quick situational awareness without putting people at additional risk. Small ground robots can provide remote surveillance, but many are controlled using joysticks or complex interfaces that require training and constant fine-grained input. In high-stress environments, precise manual control becomes a liability as it increases cognitive load, slows down deployment, and makes it harder for responders to focus on interpreting the scene and coordinating rescue actions. The result is that existing teleoperated robots can be underutilized or difficult to operate effectively when time and attention are limited.

# Solution

We will build a rescue surveillance robot with an intuitive gesture-based control interface that translates simple hand motions into high-level movement commands, paired with onboard safety behaviors to reduce operator burden. The operator wears a gesture device (IMU-based glove or wrist module) that detects orientation/motion and wirelessly transmits commands such as move forward, turn, stop, rotate/scan, and return. The robot executes these commands while enforcing safety constraints (slowing/stopping near obstacles), and provides real-time situational awareness through video streaming and sensor feedback. This enables faster, more natural control than a traditional remote controller, allowing responders to deploy the robot quickly and maintain attention on the environment rather than micromanaging the robot’s motion.

# Solution Components

## Subsystem 1

We want to make a glove that would recognize the different gestures made and transmit the corresponding motion to the robot. The motions we want the glove to recognize are forward/backward, turn left/right, and stop. Additional features, if we have time, would include “come back” and “spin/dance”.

Base System - Custom PCB

1. IMU

2. Bluetooth Transmitter/Receiver

3. 3-4 Flex sensors (1 for each finger)

4. 1 MCU (think Raspberry Pi chip)

5. Buttons to control the mode and turn on

6. Battery (PSU)

Additional System:

1. 1 Haptic Feedback Module

With the base system, the purpose of the IMU would be to detect pitch and roll because these motions would correspond with directions. Then the flex sensors would be used to detect stop and come back. We would have an MCU on the glove that will detect the different movements and send commands to the robot.

For the bonus features, we would like to have a receiver that recognizes it for our bonus feature of obstacle avoidance. When the robot has detected an obstacle and has stopped, it lets the user know through haptic feedback that it cannot move in that direction. Another bonus feature would have the glove be in different modes where it can control either the camera move (spin to see different areas).

## Subsystem 2

We want to build a system on the robot. The robot will be receiving the commands from the glove and then moving in the corresponding direction. Here are the components that will be required:

Base System - not PCB

1. Bluetooth Transmitter/Receiver

2. Motors

3. Caterpillar Track (For multi-terrain compatibility)

4. Raspberry Pi Board

Additional System

1. Camera for surveillance

2. TOF(Lidar) sensors

3. Heat/Night vision camera? (Better at looking through debris?)(Maybe too expensive?)

The robot base system will accept commands from the glove and then move accordingly. We have a caterpillar track for multi-train capability. We will use a Raspberry Pi board for receiving and executing the commands. The purpose of the board is so that we can easily add other modules for the additional system features.

The additional system will include a camera that will transmit the camera data to an external laptop. Then we will have Lidar sensors for obstacle avoidance so that if you give an instruction to the robot but it will hit an obstacle to do the command it will stop and transmit that back to the arm.

# Criterion For Success

The project will be considered successful if the following functional and performance objectives are met:

## 1. Reliable Gesture Recognition (Glove Subsystem)

The glove must accurately detect user gestures using IMU orientation (pitch and roll) and finger flex sensor inputs. The system must correctly classify and generate control commands corresponding to:

- Move forward

- Move backward

- Turn left

- Turn right

- Stop

## 2. Wireless Communication

The glove subsystem must transmit gesture commands to the robot wirelessly using Bluetooth (BLE).

## 3. Robot Motion Execution

The robot subsystem must correctly interpret received commands and translate them into motion, reliably performing:

- Forward and backward motion

- Left and right turns

- A 360° surveillance spin

## Stretch Goals (Advanced Success Criteria)

### 1. Safety Through Obstacle Avoidance

The robot must integrate onboard distance sensing (ToF/LiDAR) to prevent unsafe movements. The robot must stop before impact. The system must override unsafe commands in real time.

### 2. Haptic Feedback to User (Closed-Loop System)

When the robot is unable to execute a command due to an obstacle, haptic feedback must be sent to the glove to notify the user.

### 3. Camera/visual feedback

We will add a camera or thermal/infrared sensing method to detect human presence in low-visibility environments and provide easy remote control.

Project Videos