Project

# Title Team Members TA Documents Sponsor
23 Portable RAW Reconstruction Accelerator for Legacy CCD Imaging
Arnav Gaddam
Guyan Wang
Yuhong Chen
Gerasimos Gerogiannis design_document1.pdf
final_paper1.pdf
other1.docx
other2.pdf
video
# **RFA: Portable RAW Reconstruction Accelerator for Legacy CCD Imaging**

Group Member: Guyan Wang, Yuhong Chen

## **1\. Problem Statement**

**The "Glass-Silicon Gap":** Many legacy digital cameras (circa 2000-2010) are equipped with premium optics (Leica, Zeiss, high-grade Nikon/Canon glass) that outresolve their internal processing pipelines. While the optical pathway is high-fidelity, the final image quality is bottlenecked by:

- **Obsolete Signal Chains:** Early-stage Analogue-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) and readout circuits introduce significant read noise and pattern noise.
- **Destructive Processing:** In-camera JPEGs destroy dynamic range and detail. Even legacy RAW files are often processed with rudimentary demosaicing algorithms that fail to distinguish high-frequency texture from sensor noise.
- **Usability Void:** Users seeking the unique "CCD look" are forced to rely on cumbersome desktop post-processing workflows (e.g., Lightroom, Topaz), preventing a portable, shoot-to-share experience.

## **2\. Solution Overview**

**The "Digital Back" External Accelerator:** We propose a standalone, handheld hardware device-a "smart reconstruction box"-that interfaces physically with legacy CCD cameras. Instead of relying on the camera's internal image processor, this device ingests the raw sensor data (CCD RAW) and applies a hybrid reconstruction pipeline.

The core innovation is a **Hardware-Oriented Hybrid Pipeline**:

- **Classical Signal Processing:** Handles deterministic error correction (black level subtraction, gain normalization, hot pixel mapping).
- **Learned Estimator (AI):** A lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) or Vision Transformer model optimized for microcontroller inference (TinyML). This model does not "hallucinate" new details but acts as a probabilistic estimator to separate signal from stochastic noise based on the physics of CCD sensor characteristics.

The device will feature a touchscreen interface for file selection and "film simulation" style filter application, targeting an output quality perceptually comparable to a modern full-frame sensor (e.g., Sony A7 III) in terms of dynamic range recovery and noise floor.

## **3\. Solution Components**

### **Component A: The Compute Core (Embedded Host)**

- **MCU:** STMicroelectronics **STM32H7 Series** (e.g., STM32H747/H757).
- _Rationale:_ Dual-core architecture (Cortex-M7 + M4) allows separation of UI logic and heavy DSP operations. The Chrom-ART Accelerator helps with display handling, while the high clock speed supports the computationally intensive reconstruction algorithms.
- **Memory:** External SDRAM/HyperRAM expansion (essential for buffering full-resolution RAW files, e.g., 10MP-24MP) and high-speed QSPI Flash for AI model weight storage.

### **Component B: Connectivity & Data Ingestion Interface**

- **Physical I/O:** USB OTG (On-The-Go) Host port.
- _Function:_ The device acts as a USB Host, mounting the camera (or the camera's card reader) as a Mass Storage Device to pull RAW files (.CR2, .NEF, .RAF, .DNG).
- **Storage:** On-board MicroSD card slot for saving processed/reconstructed JPEGs or TIFFs.

### **Component C: Hybrid Reconstruction Algorithm**

- **Stage 1 (DSP):** Linearization, dark frame subtraction (optional calibration), and white balance gain application.
- **Stage 2 (NPU/AI):** A quantization-aware trained model (likely TFLite for Microcontrollers or STM32-AI) trained specifically on _noisy CCD -to- clean CMOS_ image pairs.
- _Task:_ Joint Demosaicing and Denoising (JDD).
- **Stage 3 (Color):** Application of specific "Film Looks" (LUTs) selected by the user via the UI.

### **Component D: Human-Machine Interface (HMI)**

- **Display:** 2.8" to 3.5" Capacitive Touchscreen (SPI or MIPI DSI interface).
- **GUI Stack:** TouchGFX or LVGL.
- _Workflow:_ User plugs in camera -> Device scans for RAWs -> User selects thumbnails -> User chooses "Filter/Profile" -> Device processes and saves to SD card.

## **4\. Criterion for Success**

To be considered successful, the prototype must meet the following benchmarks:

- **Quality Parity:** The output image, when blind-tested against the same scene shot on a modern CMOS sensor (Sony A7 III class), must show statistically insignificant differences in perceived noise at ISO 400-800 equivalent.
- **Edge Preservation:** The AI reconstruction must demonstrate a reduction in color moiré and false-color artifacts compared to standard bilinear demosaicing, without "smoothing" genuine texture (measured via MTF charts).
- **Latency:** Total processing time for a 10-megapixel RAW file must be under **15 seconds** on the STM32 hardware.
- **Universal RAW Support:** Successful parsing and decoding of at least two major legacy formats (e.g., Nikon .NEF from D200 era and Canon .CR2 from 5D Classic era).

## **5\. Alternatives**

- **Desktop Post-Processing (Software Only):**
- _Pros:_ Infinite computing power, established tools (DxO PureRAW), highly customized.
- _Cons:_ Destroys the portability of the photography experience; cannot be done "in the field." Need to be proficient with parameters inside the software, which requires self-training and tutoring (not user-friendly).
- **Smartphone App (via USB-C dongle):**
- _Pros:_ Powerful processors (Snapdragon/A-Series), high-res screens, easy to use.
- _Cons:_ Lack of low-level control over USB mass storage protocols for obscure legacy cameras; high friction in file management; operating system overhead prevents bare-metal optimization of the signal pipeline; unique algorithms may not be suitable for legacy cameras.
- **FPGA Implementation (Zynq/Cyclone):**
- _Pros:_ Parallel processing could make reconstruction instant.
- _Cons:_ Significantly higher complexity, cost, and power consumption compared to an STM32 implementation; higher barrier to entry for a "mini project."

Low Cost Distributed Battery Management System

Logan Rosenmayer, Daksh Saraf

Low Cost Distributed Battery Management System

Featured Project

Web Board Link: https://courses.engr.illinois.edu/ece445/pace/view-topic.asp?id=27207

Block Diagram: https://imgur.com/GIzjG8R

Members: Logan Rosenmayer (Rosenma2), Anthony Chemaly(chemaly2)

The goal of this project is to design a low cost BMS (Battery Management System) system that is flexible and modular. The BMS must ensure safe operation of lithium ion batteries by protecting the batteries from: Over temperature, overcharge, overdischarge, and overcurrent all at the cell level. Additionally, the should provide cell balancing to maintain overall pack capacity. Last a BMS should be track SOC(state of charge) and SOH (state of health) of the overall pack.

To meet these goals, we plan to integrate a MCU into each module that will handle measurements and report to the module below it. This allows for reconfiguration of battery’s, module replacements. Currently major companies that offer stackable BMSs don’t offer single cell modularity, require software adjustments and require sense wires to be ran back to the centralized IC. Our proposed solution will be able to remain in the same price range as other centralized solutions by utilizing mass produced general purpose microcontrollers and opto-isolators. This project carries a mix of hardware and software challenges. The software side will consist of communication protocol design, interrupt/sleep cycles, and power management. Hardware will consist of communication level shifting, MCU selection, battery voltage and current monitoring circuits, DC/DC converter all with low power draws and cost. (uAs and ~$2.50 without mounting)