Requirements and Verification

Description

Requirements: Requirements provide a technical definition of what each and every block in your system block diagram must be able to do. Each module in your system's block diagram should be associated with a set of requirements. If all requirements have been met for every module, you should have a fully functioning project. A good set of requirements should meet the following criteria.

Verification: Verifications are a set of procedures that you will use to verify that a requirement has been met. Every requirement should have a verification procedure associated with it. Good verification procedures will meet the following criteria.

Remember, a good R&V table should function like a debugging checklist.

Points Summary: At the time of demo, 50 points will be defined by the R&V table for your project. It is up to you to define how important each requirement is and how many points it will be worth. If your project is not fully functioning at the time of demo, these points will define how you will earn partial credit. If you do not provide a points summary or define one poorly (e.g., by giving too many points to a trivial requirement) the course staff reserve the right to define the points for your requirements without your input. The point summary should be organized as a table separate from the R&V table where the points are distributed across each functional block in your block diagram. Meeting the requirements for that block will then represent earning those points. If desired, you may define how many points each individual requirement is worth but this is not required.

This point allocation should initially be proposed by the students themselves with TA approval and finally instructor approval at DR. This point allocation must be printed and brought to the demo at the end of the semester. Changes must be approved by the instructor. Here is an example.

Examples

You can view example R&V tables in the sample Design Review documents: Good Sample DR and a Poor Sample DR. It is also helpful to examine the points summary example and a good example R&V table as it was presented in a final report.

A note about formatting: Requirements and Verification are best organized into a table and organized by functional block. If each module of your project has several requirements, you may want to create an R&V table for each block separately. Each row of your R&V table should have one requirement (in one column) and the corresponding verification procedure (in another column).

Submission and Deadlines

Requirements and Verification will be included in your Project Proposal, Design Review Document and you will receive feedback and suggestions for improvement. Changes to your R&V table made after design review must be approved by your TA. Changes made after Mock Demo will not be approved with the exception of extreme circumstances.

Unapproved changes to the R&V table that are presented at the Final Demo may be penalized up to 50 points (the total associated with R&V).

Low Cost Distributed Battery Management System

Featured Project

Web Board Link: https://courses.engr.illinois.edu/ece445/pace/view-topic.asp?id=27207

Block Diagram: https://imgur.com/GIzjG8R

Members: Logan Rosenmayer (Rosenma2), Anthony Chemaly(chemaly2)

The goal of this project is to design a low cost BMS (Battery Management System) system that is flexible and modular. The BMS must ensure safe operation of lithium ion batteries by protecting the batteries from: Over temperature, overcharge, overdischarge, and overcurrent all at the cell level. Additionally, the should provide cell balancing to maintain overall pack capacity. Last a BMS should be track SOC(state of charge) and SOH (state of health) of the overall pack.

To meet these goals, we plan to integrate a MCU into each module that will handle measurements and report to the module below it. This allows for reconfiguration of battery’s, module replacements. Currently major companies that offer stackable BMSs don’t offer single cell modularity, require software adjustments and require sense wires to be ran back to the centralized IC. Our proposed solution will be able to remain in the same price range as other centralized solutions by utilizing mass produced general purpose microcontrollers and opto-isolators. This project carries a mix of hardware and software challenges. The software side will consist of communication protocol design, interrupt/sleep cycles, and power management. Hardware will consist of communication level shifting, MCU selection, battery voltage and current monitoring circuits, DC/DC converter all with low power draws and cost. (uAs and ~$2.50 without mounting)