Direct links to Part 1 and Part 2
Solo MP This MP is to be completed without a partner.
You are welcome to get help on the MP from course staff, via open lab hours, or Piazza!
Goals
In this MP (machine problem) you will:
- learn to manipulate linked memory by writing functions to modify linked lists
- practice debugging more complex code
- practice using templates
- get familiar with iterators
Checking Out the Code
All assignments will be distributed via our release repo on github this semester. You will need to have set up your git directory to have our release as a remote repo as described in our git set up
You can merge the assignments as they are released into your personal repo with
git pull --no-edit --no-rebase release main
git push
if you are using multiple machines you may need to use the following to allow them to work correcly.
git pull --no-edit --no-rebase release main --allow-unrelated-histories
git push
The first git command will fetch and merge changes from the main
branch on your remote repository named release
into your personal. The --no-edit
flag automatically generates a commit message for you, and the--no-rebase
flag will merge the upstream branch into the current branch. Generally, these two flags shouldn’t be used, but are included for ease of merging assignments into your repo.
The second command will push to origin
(your personal), which will allow it to track the new changes from release
.
You will need to run these commands for every assignment that is released.
All the files for this lab are in the mp_lists
directory.
Preparing Your Code
This semester for MPs we are using CMake rather than just make. This allows for us to use libraries such as Catch2 that can be installed in your system rather than providing them with each assignment. This change does mean that for each assignment you need to use CMake to build your own custom makefiles. To do this you need to run the following in the base directory of the assignment. Which in this assignment is the mp_lists
directory.
mkdir build
cd build
This first makes a new directory in your assignment directory called build
. This is where you will actually build the assignment and then moves to that directory. This is not included in the provided code since we are following industry standard practices and you would normally exclude the build directory from any source control system.
Now you need to actually run CMake as follows.
cmake ..
This runs CMake to initialize the current directory which is the build
directory you just made as the location to build the assignment. The one argument to CMake here is ..
which referes to the parent of the current directory which in this case is top of the assignment. This directory has the files CMake needs to setup your assignment to be build.
At this point you can in the build directory run make as described to build the various programs for the MP.
You will need to do the above once for each assignment. You will need to run make
every time you change source code and want to compile it again.
Background Information: Template Classes
Identical to what you saw in lecture, template classes provide the ability to create generic container classes. In this MP, you will be writing a List
class.
template <typename T>
class List {
// implementation
};
This simply says that our class List
has a parametrized type that we will
call T
. Similarly, the constructor will look like this:
template <typename T>
List<T>::List() {
// implementation
}
We need the template <typename T>
or template <class T>
above all of our functions—it becomes part
of the function signature. The keywords class
and typename
can be interchanged.
Template classes need access to the implementation for compilation. Every time
a different class is used as the template, the code must be compiled to support
containing it. For example, if you want to make a List<int>,
the compiler
must take the generic List<T>
implementation code and replace all the T
s
with int
s inside it, and compile the result (this process is called
template instantiation). Our solution to this is to #include "List.hpp"
at the bottom of our List.h
file, and not include List.h
in our List.hpp
file. This ensures that whenever a client includes our header file, he/she also
gets the implementation as well for compilation purposes (there are other
solutions, but this is how we will solve it in this course).
Background Information: Linked Lists
The interface of this List
class is slightly different from what you have
seen in lecture. This List
has no sentinel nodes; the first node’s prev
pointer, and the last node’s next
pointer, are both NULL
. In lieu of these
sentinels, we keep a pointer head
to the first node, and a pointer tail
to
the last node in the List
. (In an empty list, both head
and tail
are
NULL
.) The List
class also has an integer member variable, length
, which
represents the number of nodes in the List
; you will need to maintain this
variable.
Background Information: Iterators
If you are not familiar with iterators, please read our notes here. We use iterators to figure out where we currently are in the list, what is the next/previous node, and to access the data. Iterator class has one member variable, namely a pointer to the node in the list. Some of the core functionality includes moving the pointer, getting current location, and checking the location of the iterator.
Background Information: GDB
We have a reference guide for GDB here. You should read through it to get an idea of how to start gdb, what commands you have available, etc.
To summarize a bit, you could run:
gdb --args ./test "[part=1]"
to debug the part one test cases with gdb,
gdb --args ./test "*insert*"
to debug all the tests with “insert” in their name.
Once you start gdb to execute the tests you want to run, you can set
breakpoints to help you debug. For example, we could set a breakpoint at the
beginning of a test case we want to debug, or breakpoint(s) at the beginning or
end of functions which are not behaving as we expect. For example, if we are
failing the insertFront test, we could add a breakpoint at the end of the
insertFront
function and see if the list looks how we expect. This will let
us know whether to focus our debugging on exactly what the function is doing,
or what the test case is doing after this call to insertFront
.
For example, we can set a breakpoint in line 25 of our List
class like so:
(gdb) b List.hpp:25
or a breakpoint in line 50 of the part 1 test cases like so:
(gdb) b tests/tests_part1.cpp:50
We can also set breakpoints using function names:
(gdb) b main
sets a breakpoint at the beginning of main, and
(gdb) b List<int>::sort()
sets a breakpoint at the beginning of the sort function. You can tab complete
this, so for example after typing b List<int>::ins
you can press tab to see a
list of possible functions starting with ins
in the List
class, templatized
with int
.
Remember that Catch will print not only the name of a failing test case, but also what file the test was in and the line number of the failing assertion. You can use this to decide which tests to run and where you might want to set breakpoints.
All of the functions should be implemented iteratively outside of mergesort
, which is recursive. If any functions are done recursively, you will encounter a stack overflow.
Part 1: Debugging & Implementing Linked Lists
In your mp_lists
folder, you will find that the List
class is split into four .h
or .hpp
files:
List.h
List.hpp
List-ListIterator.hpp
List-given.hpp
We have provided a partial implementation of a few List functions for this part
of the MP. Some functions are written, and some are unwritten. Those functions
which are already coded may have a few bugs in them! This part of the MP is to
help get you used to debugging certain kinds of logical and memory related
bugs, as well as writing pointer manipulation code. All the functions are
specified in List.h
, and their (potentially empty) implementations are in
List.hpp
or List-ListIterator.hpp
for you to write.
You should use gdb, valgrind, and any other debugging tools or techniques you’re comfortable with to complete the first part of this MP (as well as general debugging in Part 2 and beyond).
See the Doxygen for details of the List
class.
Notes on testing There are two ways to test this MP:
- Using
make
to makelist.cpp
into./lists
, which allows you to write your own lists to test. - Using
make test
to make./test
, which allows you to run the automated tests. - You can add test to the automated tests in
tests_student.cpp
.
You’re free to run Valgrind (or other tools) on the executables:
valgrind ./lists
valgrind ./test [part=1]
You can also select test cases to run by their names, and run those under valgrind or gdb as well:
./test "List::reverse"
./test "*insert*"
valgrind ./test "*insert*"
gdb --args ./test "*insert*"
List()
This should default construct the list. Keep in mind everything mentioned in the background for the Linked List class.
~List()
and _destroy()
Since the List
class has dynamic memory associated with it, we need to define
all of the Rule of Three. We have provided you with the Copy
Constructor and overloaded operator=
.
- You will need to implement the
_destroy()
helper function called byoperator=
(the assignment operator) and the destructor~List()
- The
_destroy()
function should free all memory allocated forListNode
objects.
Insertion
The insertFront
Function
(See the Doxygen for insertFront
.)
- This function takes a data element and prepends it to the beginning of the list.
- If the list is empty before
insertFront
is called, the list should have one element with the same value as the parameter. - You may allocate new
ListNode
s.
Example
For example, if insertFront
is called on the list of integers
< 5 4 7 >
with the parameter 6
, then the resultant list should be
< 6 5 4 7 >
The insertBack
Function
(See the Doxygen for insertBack
.)
- This function takes a data element and appends it to the end of the list.
- If the list is empty before
insertBack
is called, the list should have one element with the same value as the parameter. - You may allocate new
ListNode
s.
Example
For example, if insertBack
is called on the list of integers
< 5 4 7 >
with the parameter 6
, then the resultant list should be
< 5 4 7 6 >
Testing Your insert
Functions
Once you have completed insertFront
and insertBack
, you should compile and
test them. These tests do not rely on your iterator
make test
./test "List::insertFront*"
./test "List::insertBack*"
./test "List::insert*"
Iterator
In order to provide the client code with the ability to read the data from the
list in a uniform way, we need to have an iterator. We have provided a list
iterator class List-ListIterator.hpp
which has some functionality
implemented. However, there are a few functions yet to be written as well as
some functions with buggy implementations! You will need to worry about all the
functions with a @TODO
comment:
ListIterator& operator++()
ListIterator operator++(int)
ListIterator& operator--()
ListIterator operator--(int)
bool operator!=(const ListIterator& rhs)
You will also need to implement the begin()
and end()
functions in List.hpp
to have a way of obtaining an iterator from a List
.
Many of the more advanced functionality will be tested by using your iterator. So, you should make sure to debug and implement these after you have finished your insert functions but before you start working too much on the later functionality.
The split
Helper Function
(See the Doxygen for split
.)
- This function takes in a pointer
start
and an integersplitPoint
and splits the chain ofListNode
s into two completely distinct chains ofListNode
s aftersplitPoint
many nodes. - The split happens after
splitPoint
number of nodes, making that thehead
of the new sublist, which should be returned. In effect, there will besplitPoint
number of nodes remaining in the current list. - You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s
Example
For example, if split
is called on the list of integers
list1 = < 1 2 3 4 5 >
then after calling list2 = list1.split(2)
the lists will look like
list1 == < 1 2 >
list2 == < 3 4 5 >
Testing Your split
Function
Once you have completed split
, you should compile and test it.
make test
./test "List::split*"
You should see images actual-split_*.png
created in the working directory (these are
generated by repeatedly splitting split.png
). Compare them against
expected-split_*.png
.
The waterfall
Function
(See the Doxygen for waterfall
.)
- This function modifies the list in a cascading manner as follows.
- Every other node (starting from the second one) is removed from the list, but
appended at the back, becoming the new
tail
. - This continues until the next thing to be removed is either the
tail
(not necessarily the originaltail
!) orNULL
. - You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s. - Note that since the
tail
should be continuously updated, some nodes will be moved more than once.
Example
For example, if waterfall
is called on the list of integers
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
then the call to waterfall()
should result in
< 1 3 5 7 2 6 4 8 >
(Do you see the pattern here?)
Step-by-Step Example We will look again at the list
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
When we call waterfall
, this is how it should look step-by-step:
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > - Skip the 1
^ ^
curr tail
< 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 > - Remove the 2 and move it at the end
^ ^
curr tail
< 1 3 5 6 7 8 2 4 > - Skip the 3, and move the 4 to the end
^ ^
curr tail
< 1 3 5 7 8 2 4 6 > - Skip the 5 and move the 6 to the end
^ ^
curr tail
< 1 3 5 7 2 4 6 8 > - Skip the 7 and move the 8 to the end
^ ^
curr tail
< 1 3 5 7 2 6 8 4 > - We have moved past the original tail of the list.
^ ^ This is okay! Skip the 2 and move the 4 to the end,
curr tail now for the second time!
< 1 3 5 7 2 6 4 8 > Skip the 6 and move the 8 to the end, now for the second time!
^ ^
curr tail
We are done now because we skip over the 4
and get to the tail
of the list.
The 8
stays in place, and we have finished. If you were keeping track of
moves, you would notice that a number (they happen to be in order here for
convenience) gets moved the same amount of times as it is divisible by 2!
Technically this might not be true for the 8
, but we could have moved it that
last time, it just would have stayed where it was (remove it from the tail
and put it back to the tail
). Kinda neat, huh?
Testing Your waterfall
Function
Once you have completed waterfall
, you should compile and test it.
make test
./test "List::waterfall*"
Testing Part 1
Compile your code using the following command:
make test
After compiling, you can run all of the part one tests at once with the following command:
./test [part=1]
Notes
- These tests are deliberately insufficient. We strongly recommend augmenting these tests with your own.
- Be sure to think carefully about edge cases and reasonable behavior of each of the functions when called on an empty list, or when given an empty list as a parameter.
- It is highly advised to test with lists of integers before testing
with lists of
HSLAPixel
s. - Printing out a list both forward and backwards (eg, using an iterator or a custom print function) is one way to check whether you have the double-linking correct, not just forward linking. Printing the size may also help debug other logical errors.
DOUBLE CHECK that you can confidently answer “no” to the following questions:
- Did I allocate new memory in functions that disallow it?
- Did I modify the data entry of any
ListNode
? - Do I leak memory?
Extra Credit Submission
For extra credit, you can submit the code you have implemented and tested for part one of mp_lists. Follow the submission instructions section for handing in your code.
Part 2
The reverse
Helper Function
(See the Doxygen for reverse
.)
In List.hpp
you will see that a public reverse
method is already defined
and given to you. You are to write the helper function that the method calls.
- This function will reverse a chain of linked memory beginning at
startPoint
and ending atendPoint
. - The
startPoint
andendPoint
pointers should point at the new start and end of the chain of linked memory. - The
next
member of theListNode
before the sequence should point at the new start, and theprev
member of theListNode
after the sequence should point to the new end. - You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s.
Example For example, if we have a list of integers
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
(with head
pointing at 1
and tail
pointing at 7
) and call the public
function reverse()
The resulting list should be
< 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 >
(with head
pointing at 7
and tail
pointing at 1
)
Your helper function should be as general as possible! In other words, do
not assume your reverse()
helper function is called only to reverse the
entire list—it may be called to reverse only parts of a given list.
Additionally, the pointers startPoint
and endPoint
that are parameters to
this function should at its completion point to the beginning and end of the
new, reversed sublist.
The reverseNth
Function
(See the Doxygen for reverseNth
.)
- This function accepts as a parameter an integer, , and reverses blocks of elements in the list.
- The order of the blocks should not be changed.
- If the final block (that is, the one containing the
tail
) is not long enough to have elements, then just reverse what remains in the list. In particular, if is larger than the length of the list, this will do the same thing as reverse. - You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s.
Example
For example, if reverseNth
is called on the list of integers
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
then the call to reverseNth(3)
should result in
< 3 2 1 6 5 4 9 8 7 >
For the list of integers
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
the call to reverseNth(4)
should result in
< 4 3 2 1 6 5 >
Hint
You should try to use your reverse()
helper function here.
Testing Your reverse
Functions
Once you have completed reverse
and reverseNth
, you should compile and test
them.
make test
./test "List::reverse"
./test "List::reverseNth #1"
./test "List::reverseNth #2"
Sorting
You will be implementing the helper functions for one more member function of
the List
template class: sort
. This is designed to help you practice
pointer manipulation and solve an interesting algorithm problem. In the process
of solving this problem, you will implement several helper functions along the
way—we have provided public interfaces for these helper functions to help you
test your code.
The merge
Helper Function
(See the Doxygen for merge
.)
- This function takes in two pointers to heads of sublists and merges the two lists into one in sorted order (increasing).
- You can assume both lists are sorted, and the final list should remain sorted.
- You should use
operator<
on the data fields ofListNode
objects. This allows you to perform the comparisons necessary for maintaining the sorted order. - You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s!
Example For example, if we have the following lists
list1 = < 1 3 4 6 >
list2 = < 2 5 7 >
then after calling list1.mergeWith(list2)
the lists will look like
list1 == < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
list2 == < >
Testing Your merge
Function
Once you have completed merge
, you should compile and test it.
make test
./test "List::merge"
You should see the image actual-merge.png
created in the working directory if your
program terminates properly. This is generated by merging the images
tests/merge1.png
and tests/merge2.png
. Compare this against expected-merge.png
.
The mergesort
Helper Function
(See the Doxygen for mergesort
.)
- This function sorts the list using the merge sort algorithm, explained below.
- You should use
operator<
on the data fields ofListNode
objects. This allows you to perform the comparisons necessary for sorting. - You should use the private helper functions you wrote above to help you solve this problem.
- You may NOT allocate new
ListNode
s - This function’s runtime will be graded for efficiency (correct Big-Oh runtime)
Example
For example, if sort
is called on the list of integers
< 6 1 5 8 4 3 7 2 9 >
the resulting list should be
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Merge Sort — Algorithm Details
Merge Sort is a recursive sorting algorithm that behaves as follows:
- Base Case: A list of size 1 is sorted. Return.
- Recursive Case:
- Split the current list into two smaller, more manageable parts
- Sort the two halves (this should be a recursive call)
- Merge the two sorted halves back together into a single list
In other words, Merge Sort operates on the principle of breaking the problem into smaller and smaller pieces, and merging the sorted, smaller lists together to finally end up at a completely sorted list.
Testing Part 2
Compile your code using the following command:
make test
After compiling, you can run the part two tests at once with the following command:
./test [part=2]
Hint: Comparing similar images
Occasionally diff
may tell you that the 2 images differ, but you cannot easily tell the
difference with the naked eye. In these scenarios, there is a great tool on ews machines
called compare
which can help you.
compare out.png out_01.png out_difference.png
This command will create a new image called out_difference.png where any differing pixels will be bright red.
Notes
- These tests are deliberately insufficient. We strongly recommend augmenting these tests with your own.
- Be sure to think carefully about reasonable behavior of each of the functions when called on an empty list, or when given an empty list as a parameter.
- It is highly advised to test with lists of integers before testing
with lists of
HSLAPixel
s. - Printing out a list both forward and backwards is one way to check whether you have the double-linking correct, not just forward linking. Printing the size may also help debug other logical errors.
DOUBLE CHECK that you can confidently answer “no” to the following questions:
- Did I allocate new memory in functions that disallow it?
- Did I modify the data entry of any
ListNode
? - Do I leak memory?
Grading Information
We will use the following files for grading:
List.h
List.hpp
List-ListIterator.hpp
All other files including any testing files you have added will not be used for grading.
To submit your assignment you upload these file to the mp_lists questions on PrairieLearn.